Why this is hard to get right
The Problem with Writing Your Own Press Kit Copy
Maria Chen is the co-founder of a B2B fintech startup that just closed a $3.2M seed round. Her PR agency asked for a press kit by Friday — specifically a company boilerplate and her founder bio. She figured she'd knock it out in 30 minutes.
Three hours later, she had four drafts and hated all of them.
The first version read like a marketing brochure: "We're disrupting the payments space with cutting-edge solutions." Her PR contact flagged it immediately. Reporters don't print press releases that sound like ad copy. The second version went too far in the other direction — dense, technical, and 300 words too long. The third version was fine but forgettable. The fourth version she deleted after rereading the first sentence.
The core problem wasn't her writing. It was that she was trying to solve two problems at once: what to say and how to say it. She hadn't decided who the audience was. She hadn't locked down which proof points to include. She hadn't thought about tone rules. And she kept second-guessing her own word counts.
She turned to an AI assistant and typed: "Write a company boilerplate and founder bio for my startup."
The output was polished but useless. It invented metrics. It used industry language she'd never say out loud. The founder bio read like a LinkedIn summary from 2015. She had to rewrite almost everything — and she still wasn't sure it was right.
The issue wasn't the AI. It was the prompt. A vague input produces a generic output. Without knowing the audience (tech reporters, not potential customers), the format (60–75 words for the boilerplate, not 200), the proof points (23 enterprise clients, $3.2M raised), or the constraints (no ROI claims without attribution), the AI had no way to write something usable.
When Maria rebuilt her prompt with specific deliverables, a defined audience, real proof points, and clear tone rules, the AI returned something she could paste directly into her press kit. She made two small edits. Done.
The lesson: press kit copy fails not because AI is bad at writing, but because the brief is almost always underdone. A company boilerplate and founder bio look simple. But they pack a lot of decisions into very few words. Get the brief right, and the copy writes itself.
Common mistakes to avoid
Including Hype Instead of Proof
Prompts that say 'highlight our innovative approach' produce copy full of adjectives and empty of facts. Reporters need verifiable numbers — customer counts, revenue ranges, funding amounts, named partners. If your prompt doesn't supply real proof points, the AI will invent plausible-sounding ones. Always feed the AI the specific figures you want quoted.
Skipping the Audience Distinction
A boilerplate written for tech reporters reads very differently from one written for enterprise buyers or investors. Copy for reporters should be scannable and fact-dense. Copy for buyers should connect to pain and outcome. Most prompts say nothing about audience, so the AI averages across all of them and pleases none. Name your primary reader explicitly.
Not Specifying Word Counts
Without word count constraints, AI almost always overshoots. A boilerplate becomes a paragraph essay. A founder bio runs to 300 words. Press kits have real format requirements — wire services, speaker pages, and media templates all have hard limits. Lock the word count in the prompt, not in post-editing.
Leaving Out What You Cannot Say
Startups often have legal, compliance, or investor-relations restrictions on what they can claim publicly. If you don't tell the AI what's off-limits — unverified ROI claims, forward-looking statements, competitor comparisons — it will include them confidently. A published press kit with a compliance violation costs more than a careful prompt. Add a 'do not include' line.
Treating the Boilerplate and Bio as One Task
Asking for both in a single vague sentence causes the AI to blend the formats. The boilerplate ends up sounding biographical. The bio ends up reading like a company description. Each piece has a distinct job. Separate deliverables with separate word counts and separate purposes force the AI to treat them as distinct assets.
Omitting the Differentiator
Most companies operate in competitive markets. Without telling the AI why you win — not just what you do — the boilerplate could describe any of your competitors. A strong differentiator line is the single most important input for press copy. Even a rough version ('the only platform that does X without requiring Y') sharpens the output dramatically.
The transformation
Write a company boilerplate and a founder bio for my startup to use in our press kit.
You’re a PR copywriter. Write **(1) a 60–75 word company boilerplate** and **(2) a 140–170 word founder bio**. Context: - Company: [Name], founded [Year], based in [City] - Audience: **tech reporters and B2B buyers** - What we do: [1-sentence description] - Proof: **[Customer count], [ARR or users], [funding], [notable partners]** - Differentiator: [Why we win] Requirements: 1) Use **plain language**, no hype. 2) Include **one quantifiable result** in each piece. 3) End the founder bio with **one sentence on mission**.
Why this works
Defined Deliverables Remove Ambiguity
The After Prompt specifies two separate assets with exact word counts: a 60–75 word boilerplate and a 140–170 word founder bio. This prevents the AI from merging formats or padding output. When the model knows the target length and the asset type, it allocates words intentionally rather than defaulting to a generic long-form block.
Audience Context Shapes Tone
The After Prompt names the audience explicitly: 'tech reporters and B2B buyers.' This one phrase shifts the entire register of the output. The AI understands that reporters need scannable facts and buyers need outcome language — and it writes copy that works for both without defaulting to generic marketing voice.
Proof Points Anchor Credibility
The Context block requires customer count, ARR or users, funding, and notable partners as inputs. These inputs prevent the AI from inventing metrics or using vague phrases like 'thousands of customers.' Real figures make press copy publishable. Without them, even a well-structured prompt produces fluff.
Tone Rules Prevent Marketing Fluff
Requirement 1 in the After Prompt states: 'Use plain language, no hype.' This instruction overrides the AI's default tendency to reach for superlatives and buzzwords. It also signals the professional register — authoritative, factual, and editor-ready rather than sales-forward.
Structural Constraints Force Discipline
Requirements 2 and 3 mandate one quantifiable result per piece and a mission-focused closing sentence in the bio. These constraints mirror the editorial standards that journalists and conference organizers actually apply. Forcing these elements in the prompt means they appear in the output — not as afterthoughts but as core copy decisions.
The framework behind the prompt
The Theory Behind Effective PR Copy
Press kit writing sits at the intersection of journalism norms, brand positioning, and legal compliance — three disciplines that often pull in opposite directions. Understanding that tension explains why so many first drafts fail.
Journalists operate under what communications researchers call the inverted pyramid model: the most newsworthy information goes first, detail follows, and background comes last. A company boilerplate violates this model when it opens with founding story or mission rather than proof. Reporters skim. If the first sentence doesn't signal credibility, the rest doesn't get read.
The PESO model (Paid, Earned, Shared, Owned media), developed by Gini Dietrich, helps explain why boilerplate copy needs to work across multiple contexts. A single boilerplate appears in owned media (your website), earned media (press releases), and shared media (partner pages). Copy that works in one channel often fails in another because the audience's posture and trust level differs. The strongest boilerplates are written for earned media — the hardest audience — and then adapted down.
Founder bios follow a different logic. Research on narrative transportation theory (Green and Brock, 2000) shows that readers engage more deeply when they follow a coherent personal story arc. A bio that shows a career trajectory — why this person, why this problem, why now — is more persuasive than a credential list, even if the credential list is more impressive on paper.
The STAR framework (Situation, Task, Action, Result) borrowed from interview prep applies surprisingly well to founder bios. Bios that embed a career-defining situation and its resolution are consistently more memorable than those that list roles chronologically.
Finally, press copy operates under real legal constraints. The SEC's Regulation FD, the FTC's endorsement guidelines, and standard corporate communications policies all govern what a public-facing document can claim. A well-structured prompt should account for these constraints explicitly — not as an afterthought, but as a design requirement.
Prompt variations
You're a PR copywriter specializing in early-stage tech startups.
Write two assets:
- A 50–65 word company boilerplate for a startup with limited public metrics
- A 120–150 word founder bio for a first-time founder
Context:
- Company: Veridian, founded 2023, based in Austin, TX
- What we do: AI-powered lease abstraction software for commercial real estate firms
- Stage: Pre-revenue, 12 design partners, $800K pre-seed raised
- Founder: Jordan Park, former CRE attorney, 8 years at Skadden
Requirements:
- Lead with the problem solved, not the product features
- Use the founder's professional background as the credibility anchor instead of company metrics
- Keep language plain and verifiable — no claims about 'disruption' or 'revolution'
- End the bio with one sentence about what success looks like for Jordan personally
You're a financial PR writer. Write two press kit assets for a Series B SaaS company preparing for a fundraise announcement.
Assets:
- A 75–90 word company boilerplate optimized for financial press and investor audiences
- A 160–190 word founding team bio covering two co-founders
Context:
- Company: Loopline, founded 2020, HQ in New York
- Product: Procurement intelligence platform for mid-market manufacturers
- Metrics: $8.2M ARR, 140 enterprise customers, 3x YoY growth, $22M Series B led by Bessemer
- Co-founders: CEO Dana Reyes (ex-McKinsey, supply chain practice) and CTO Marcus Webb (ex-Amazon Robotics)
Requirements:
- Open the boilerplate with a market size or growth claim, not a product description
- Include ARR and customer count in the boilerplate — no rounding
- Balance the bio equally between both founders — 80 words each
- Avoid forward-looking revenue projections or unattributed market share claims
- Close with the company's mission statement in one sentence
You're a communications writer for mission-driven organizations. Write two press kit assets.
- A 60–75 word organizational boilerplate for grant applications and media coverage
- A 130–160 word executive director bio for speaker pages and press mentions
Context:
- Organization: Watershed Collective, founded 2018, based in Portland, OR
- Mission: We train formerly incarcerated adults in water infrastructure trades and place them with municipal employers
- Impact: 340 graduates, 87% 12-month job retention rate, partnerships with 14 city governments
- Executive Director: Sylvia Okafor, formerly ACLU policy director, MacArthur Fellow 2021
Requirements:
- Lead with impact numbers, not organizational history
- Name specific government partners if possible — credibility over vagueness
- Use active, present-tense verbs throughout
- The bio should explain why Sylvia shifted from policy to direct service — one clear sentence
- Avoid donor-centric or charity-adjacent framing — write toward earned media and civic audiences
You're a brand copywriter. Write two short assets for a consultant building a personal brand press kit.
- A 40–55 word professional bio for media inquiries and podcast guest pages
- A 70–90 word extended bio for conference speaker pages and article bylines
Context:
- Name: Priya Nair
- Role: Independent supply chain resilience consultant, formerly VP of Operations at Nike
- Expertise: Nearshoring strategy, supplier diversification, crisis response planning
- Credibility: Quoted in WSJ and Bloomberg, keynoted at MIT Supply Chain Summit 2024, 22 years of industry experience
Requirements:
- Write in third person throughout
- Open both versions with the outcome Priya delivers, not her job title
- Include one media credential and one speaking credential in each version
- Keep the tone authoritative and direct — no soft phrases like 'passionate about' or 'dedicated to'
When to use this prompt
Marketing teams updating a media kit
Create consistent boilerplate and founder bios for press pages, partner decks, and PR outreach.
Product managers announcing a new business line
Refresh boilerplate language to match a new product focus without rewriting from scratch.
Sales professionals supporting outbound campaigns
Drop a credible company summary into proposals and one-pagers that prospects can trust.
Leaders preparing conference materials
Generate a tight founder bio for event organizers, speaker pages, and introductions.
Pro tips
- 1
Collect proof points first so your boilerplate reads like facts, not claims.
- 2
Define your audience upfront because reporter-friendly copy differs from buyer-focused copy.
- 3
Set word counts to prevent rambling and keep every sentence useful.
- 4
Specify what you can’t say so the output stays compliant with legal and brand rules.
The single biggest predictor of press kit quality is the quality of inputs you bring to the prompt. Before you write a single word, collect the following in a working document:
Company metrics to gather:
- Founding date and headquarters city
- Total funding raised (by round if public)
- Named investors (lead investors only, or as permitted)
- Customer count or user count — be precise, not rounded
- Revenue range or ARR (if public or shareable under NDA waiver)
- Named enterprise clients or partners (with permission)
- Awards, rankings, or certifications (e.g., SOC 2, G2 Leader)
Founder inputs to gather:
- Previous employers or institutions (named, with role and years)
- Career inflection point — the moment that led to founding this company
- One quote in the founder's own voice about the mission
- Media appearances (publication name, date, topic)
- Speaking engagements (event name, year)
- Academic credentials if professionally relevant
Legal and compliance checklist:
- Which metrics require attribution or qualification?
- Are there forward-looking statements to avoid?
- Which customers or partners have approved public mention?
- What terms or claims does legal flag as risky?
Building this library takes 20–30 minutes once. It makes every future press kit, bio update, or PR pitch dramatically faster — because the prompt inputs are already verified and ready to drop in.
A single boilerplate rarely works perfectly across every channel. Here's how to adapt the core version you generate:
Wire service releases (PR Newswire, Business Wire): These services typically display your boilerplate at the end of a release under 'About [Company].' Keep it to 60–75 words. Use the third person throughout. Include one hyperlink to your website. Avoid superlatives — editors may flag them.
Conference and event speaker pages: Organizers usually want a short bio (under 75 words) and sometimes a separate one-paragraph version. Emphasize speaking credentials and expertise over company metrics. Include the founder's name in the first sentence.
Partner and co-marketing decks: Buyers reading co-marketing materials want proof of stability and fit. Lead with customer count or named partners. Add a one-sentence product description that directly connects to the partner's category.
Podcast guest pages and media appearances: These often want a 40–60 word 'guest bio' that emphasizes expertise and listenership relevance. Cut company history. Lead with what the guest will help listeners understand.
LinkedIn and personal website: First-person is acceptable here. You can be slightly warmer and more narrative than press copy. Extend the mission sentence into a short paragraph.
The fastest workflow: generate the canonical 70-word third-person boilerplate once with a strong prompt. Then adapt it for each channel with a short follow-up prompt specifying the new format and audience.
If your company operates across multiple markets, a single English boilerplate is rarely enough. Here's how to extend this prompt approach for international press kits:
Localization, not translation: Ask the AI to adapt the boilerplate for a specific country's press culture — not just translate it. German financial press, for example, expects precise revenue figures and avoids marketing language. UK tech press prefers understated credibility. US tech press tolerates more growth-forward framing. Specify the target country and press category in the prompt.
Currency and metric localization: If your funding or revenue is in USD, tell the AI whether to convert to local currency and at what exchange rate, or to keep USD as the reference currency for global press.
Regulatory language adaptation: Some markets (EU, UK) have stricter financial communication rules than the US. Add a requirements line: 'Flag any language that may require legal review under EU financial communications guidelines.'
Sample multilingual prompt addition: Add this block to your standard prompt: 'After generating the English version, produce a French-language adaptation of the boilerplate for use in francophone European press. Adjust formality and credibility signals for French business journalism standards. Do not directly translate — rewrite for the cultural register.'
This approach produces localized copy that reads naturally rather than translated copy that reads awkwardly.
When not to use this prompt
When This Prompt Pattern Is Not the Right Tool
This prompt structure works well for standard press kit assets. But several scenarios call for a different approach:
Don't use this prompt if you're in an active securities-sensitive window. Companies in a quiet period before an IPO or secondary offering have strict legal limits on what they can say publicly. AI-generated copy in this context creates compliance risk, regardless of how carefully you instruct the model. Work with your legal team and IR firm directly.
Don't use this prompt to replace a professional PR writer for a major announcement. A Series C raise, a merger, a CEO transition, or a crisis response requires strategic judgment that goes beyond formatting. Use this prompt for standard, evergreen press materials — not for high-stakes moments.
Don't use this prompt if your company has no verifiable metrics yet. The prompt is built around proof points. If you're pre-product or pre-revenue with no customers, no funding, and no named partners, the output will lack credibility regardless of how well you structure the prompt. In that case, focus the copy on the founder's background and the problem being solved — and use the Solo Founder variation instead.
Avoid this prompt for highly regulated industries without domain-specific review. Healthcare, financial services, and legal technology companies face sector-specific restrictions on claims. AI output in these categories needs legal review before publication. Use this prompt to generate a draft, not a final asset.
Troubleshooting
The AI produces a boilerplate that sounds like a sales pitch, not a press asset
Add this explicit instruction to your Requirements block: 'Write for a skeptical journalist, not a potential buyer. Eliminate any language that functions as a call to action or implies urgency.' Also check that you haven't included sales-oriented inputs like 'highlight our competitive advantage' — replace these with neutral factual framing like 'describe what distinguishes our approach from legacy solutions.'
The founder bio comes out generic and could describe anyone in the industry
The fix is almost always missing inputs. Add at least one of these to your Context block: a named career moment ('left [Employer] after leading X initiative'), a specific personal motivation for founding the company, or a direct quote from the founder. Ask the AI to 'make this bio recognizable as this specific person's story, not a template.' Specificity in the input forces specificity in the output.
The output exceeds the word count by 30-50 words despite setting a limit
Add the word count constraint to the Requirements section AND to the asset label at the top. For example: '(1) A 60–75 word company boilerplate [HARD LIMIT: 75 words]'. If it still overshoots, follow up with: 'The boilerplate is [X] words. Edit it to exactly 70 words without removing any of the proof points.' That second instruction forces the AI to compress rather than cut substance.
The boilerplate and bio use inconsistent company names, titles, or claims
Inconsistency usually means the AI is drawing on its training data about your company rather than your inputs alone. Add this line: 'Use only the information I have provided. Do not supplement with external knowledge about this company or its founders.' Also standardize your inputs — use the exact company name, founder name, and title you want to appear in print, every time.
The output is technically accurate but flat — no voice or personality
Add a tone reference to your prompt. For example: 'Match the directness and confidence of a Sequoia portfolio company announcement' or 'Write with the plainspoken credibility of a Stratechery article.' You can also include one sentence from an existing piece of your own writing and say: 'Match the register of this sentence in the rest of the copy.' Concrete tone models beat abstract adjectives like 'engaging' or 'authentic.'
How to measure success
How to Evaluate Your Press Kit Output
Don't just read your output — score it against these specific signals:
Boilerplate checklist:
- Contains at least one hard number (customer count, funding amount, or user metric) — not a range or estimate
- Opens with what the company does, not when it was founded or where it's headquartered
- Falls within your target word count — count manually, not by estimate
- Passes the 'could this describe a competitor?' test — if yes, the differentiator is too weak
- Reads cleanly at a 10th-grade level — use a readability tool; press copy should not require expertise to parse
Founder bio checklist:
- Names at least one prior employer or institution with a specific role or achievement
- Explains why this person founded this company in one clear sentence
- Closes with a forward-looking mission sentence that sounds like the founder, not a press release
- Contains no unattributed claims about the founder's impact or influence
Overall quality signal: Hand the output to someone who doesn't know your company. Ask them what the company does, who leads it, and why it's credible. If they can answer all three in 30 seconds, the copy is working.
Now try it on something of your own
Reading about the framework is one thing. Watching it sharpen your own prompt is another — takes 90 seconds, no signup.
Build a press-ready boilerplate and founder bio with the right proof points, word counts, and tone for journalists and buyers.
Try one of these
Frequently asked questions
Add a 'do not include' line to your prompt listing restricted figures. Then substitute a verifiable alternative: instead of exact ARR, use a growth rate ('tripled revenue year-over-year') or a customer count range ('more than 50 enterprise clients'). Tell the AI what you can say, not just what you can't. That way it finds credible language within your legal guardrails.
One well-structured prompt works fine if you separate the deliverables explicitly with numbered labels and distinct word counts. If you send them as one vague request, the AI blends the formats. The After Prompt on this page shows the right structure: label each asset, set its length, and give shared context once rather than repeating it.
Include at least two of these: a named employer or institution, a specific career moment or inflection point, a personal motivation or origin story, and a closing mission sentence in the founder's own voice. Generic bios fail because they list credentials without context. Give the AI a brief quote or the founder's own words and ask it to match that register.
50–75 words is the standard range for most press kits, wire services, and speaker pages. Some trade publications require under 50 words. Conference organizers often allow up to 100. Always check the submission guidelines of your target outlets. When in doubt, write to 60–70 words — it fits almost every format without cutting.
Yes. Swap the 'Company' context block for your name, role, and years of experience. Replace funding and customer metrics with media credentials, speaking engagements, and named clients or employers. The structure works identically — the inputs just shift from organizational proof to individual credibility. See the Solo Founder variation on this page for a ready-to-use version.
Add this line to your requirements: 'Use only the metrics and facts I have provided above. Do not invent figures, estimates, or customer names.' Also fill in every context field — even rough numbers. When the AI sees blank inputs, it fills them creatively. Giving it real (even imprecise) data eliminates that behavior almost entirely.
Update it whenever a major proof point changes: a new funding round, a significant customer milestone, a leadership change, or a pivot in product focus. Stale boilerplates with outdated metrics undermine credibility with reporters who do basic fact-checking. Build the prompt once, save it, and re-run it with updated inputs each quarter or after a major announcement.